![]() |
|
![]() |
|
|
|
![]() |
||||
|
||||
KCDC Announces Winner of 2007 Light Rail Urban Design CompetitionThe Kansas City Design Center (KCDC) has announced the winner of an urban design competition evaluating the potential for transit-oriented development (TOD) in Kansas City. Five professional teams submitted development proposals to evaluate how Kansas City’s proposed light rail system might stimulate economic and community development along the route adopted by Kansas City voters in November. Three of these proposals advanced to the final phase of the competition, and were presented Friday, May 18 to a distinguished jury of public officials, community leaders, and transportation agency representatives. After hearing all three proposals, the jury selected a proposal by BNIM Architects of Kansas City as the winner of the competition. The winning proposal was featured in an article by Kevin Collison in the May 25, 2007 edition of the Kansas City Star. The CompetitionThe jury for the first phase of the competition included North Kansas City Mayor Gene Bruns, Kansas City's 2nd District-at-large Councilman Ed Ford, Senior Engineer Dick Jarrold of the KC Area Transportation Authority, MoDOT Assistant District Engineer Linda Clark, and Brad Scott of the U.S. General Services Administration. Urban Society President Dave Scott also served on the panel that heard presentations by the three finalists in the competition. The competition was organized in collaboration with the Regional Transit Alliance (RTA), and with the financial support of the Downtown Council of Kansas City, the Light Rail Task Force of the Northland Regional Chamber of Commerce, and the Greater Kansas City Homebuilders’ Association. The ProposalsFive proposals were submitted for the first phase of the competition in mid-April, at which time the jury selected three finalists to advance to the second phase of the competition. The finalists include BNIM Architects, a planning team led by staff from the City of Olathe, and Gastinger-Walker-Harden Architects. The jury evaluated each proposal based on its ability to overcome challenges to implementing light rail in Kansas City, the quality of the architecture and urban design concepts presented, the proposal's originality and technical merit, and its political and economic feasibility. BNIM Architects The proposal demonstrates how light rail might stimulate new private investment with less intense demand for parking at four locations:
Click here to download the BNIM proposal [14,600Kb PDF file].
Olathe Concept While this proposal fell outside the official mandate for the competition, the Jury felt that there was great value in recognizing the growing importance of an interconnected, seamless, regional transit system, like the Smart Moves plan proposed by the Mid-America Regional Council.. Click here to download the Olathe proposal [4,906Kb PDF file].
Gastinger Walker Harden Architects The marketplace would be enclosed by a glass canopy "scarf", which would create a signature design element along the street while simultaneously generating electric power to service the development. Recommended policy changes included encouraging dense, mixed-use development along Main while preserving existing neighborhood character on adjacent streets. Click here to download the Gastinger Walker Harden proposal [6,832Kb PDF file].
Next StepsA summary of the proposals, highlighting key findings and concerns explored by the jury, was presented to the Transportation and Infrastructure Committee of the Kansas City, Mo. City Council, on Wednesday, May 30, 2007. Additional presentations will be made to partnering organizations and sponsors of the competition. A panel discussion about the competition was featured on KCUR-FM's "Up to Date", Monday, June 4, 2007. A formal public presentation of the winning concept, along with an exhibition of all work submitted in the competition, is being planned. About the CompetitionIn 2005, the KCDC, in collaboration with AIA Kansas City and the City of Kansas City, Missouri, developed a set of ten Guiding Principles for Civic Design. The Guiding Principles seek to provide a values-based framework for public deliberations about design policy issues, including public transit: Effective public transit serves the City and the region by improving access to the urban core and reducing traffic congestion and pollution. Transit also strengthens the urban fabric by supporting walkable neighborhoods, urban density, and mixed-use development. Development policies and incentives should promote transit-oriented development, and transit should be used to foster stronger connections between urban and suburban areas. The goal of this competition is to contribute to a civic design process that helps to identify issues and opportunities for public transit to strengthen Kansas City’s public realm. The five contributing teams proposed site-specific urban and architectural design concepts for TOD in both urban and suburban contexts, and identify the zoning tools, financial incentives, and other policies needed to support ridership, walkability, and the critical densities needed to ensure the viability of a light rail system. Collectively, these proposals demonstrate how public transit investments can work in concert with supportive local development policies to strengthen the character and vitality of Kansas City’s built environment. The JuryThe following community leaders and transportation agency representatives served as jurors for this competition. Hon. Gene Bruns Linda Clark, P.E. Ed Ford * Dick Jarrold Brad Scott * Dave Scott ** * Phase One only | ||||