With mid-review quickly approaching, everyone in the studio has been deep in their individual projects, refining ideas and preparing the deliverables that will communicate our design intentions. Draft plans, diagrams, and models have been taking shape across the desks as we continue to test ideas. While we are all working toward the same broader goal (strengthening the future of the Greenline) each of us is focusing on a different site and set of opportunities along the corridor. Each student has been analyzing their specific site conditions and thinking critically about how design can support the trail while improving the surrounding neighborhood. Some proposals focus on public gathering spaces, while others explore how landscape, circulation, and small-scale development can activate underutilized areas. It has been exciting to see how everyone’s individual vision contributes to a larger urban story unfolding along the corridor.

While the week has been full of focused studio time, we also had the chance to step away from our desks for a bit and connect with fellow design students. Later in the week, the studio hosted a happy hour with students from the University of Kansas School of Architecture & Design. It was a great opportunity to meet other students working in architecture and urban design and to hear about the projects they have been exploring in their own studios. Conversations ranged from studio life and design ideas to the realities of long nights and looming reviews. It was great to connect with peers who understand the rhythm of design school and the challenges that come with it. Moments like this remind us that while studio work can be intense, the design community across the region is collaborative and supportive.

The coming days will be filled with refining drawings and preparing to share our work. If this week was any indication, the projects along the Greenline are shaping up to be explorations of how design can enhance movement, community, and public space in Kansas City.

Written by Delani Leary, Architecture Student

This week in studio our focus shifted primarily to our Greenline segment teams as we prepare for our mid review. We also met with a few different groups to broaden our horizons in studio and in seminar. I’m part of the East segment team, which stretches from Cliff Drive through The Paseo and down to 18th and Vine District. It’s a corridor shaped by history, long-term divestment, and incredible resilience that we as a team are working to honor. Our central argument is that the Greenline should serve as a tool for connection, stitching together areas divided by highways, reconnecting communities and resources and opening the possibilities for fresh opportunities.

Donna Schneck-Hamlin discussion

On Monday we met virtually with Donna Schneck-Hamlin of Workforce Solar Housing Partnership to discuss community land trusts. At their core, CLTs rethink what it means to own a home. In this model, the home owner purchases the house while the land beneath it is held within a trust and leased at a low cost. This structure keeps the initial purchase price lower while ensuring long term affordability when the home is resold. The homeowner still builds equity, but the property remains accessible to the next buyer which is critical in neighborhoods vulnerable to displacement. 

Later in the week we attended the Mid-America Regional Council's Housing Policy Innovation Series at Habitat for Humanity of Kansas City. We heard from Matthew Petty, Kyle Clifton, Leslie Karr, and Uday Manepalli about pre-approved building plans. The idea is straightforward, a developed portfolio of well-designed and code compliant housing plans that are able to move through the approval process more quickly. Claremore, OK, Overland Park, KS, and Kansas City, MO are early adopters of this new strategy in streamlining the construction of missing middle housing. While there is much to learn about the strategy, it holds immense promise for helping address the kinds of housing neighborhoods need.

As we move toward our mid review, our work on the Greenline feels very connected to Kansas City and its problems. We have an opportunity as design students to respond to these problems. If the Greenline can operate as a connective tissue, socially, economically, and create a stronger, more equitable, more connected ecosystem through our city, it moves beyond the diagram into viability. 

Written by Jonah Hammel, Architecture Student

As a studio, we’ve been developing proposals for different segments of the Greenline, organizing our work into four key areas: North, East, West, and South. This structure has helped us break down the larger system into more manageable pieces while still thinking about how they connect as a whole. This week, we focused on connecting our design work to real people and real places across Kansas City.

Rick Usher, Crossroads Community Improvement District

We welcomed Rick Usher from the Crossroads Community Improvement District to our studio. He spoke to us about the ongoing work in the Crossroads and other neighborhood developments. He talked about new bike lanes along Southwest Boulevard that could possibly be integrated into the Greenline and efforts to increase the number of trees in the Crossroads. He gave feedback on different ideas for alignment along the southern portion of the Crossroads. The Southern segment team is currently looking at two different streets for their segments, one of them being a commercial trail along 18th street. Hearing directly from a neighborhood leader like Rick gave us a clear understanding of the potential impact of our project and how to incorporate other community efforts.

Later in the week, we took a short studio trip to the Berkley Riverfront. Walking the site allowed us to see recent developments firsthand and observe how public space, infrastructure, and recreation come together along the river. The visit wrapped up with a stop at Two Birds One Stone, giving us time to reflect as a group in a more casual setting. 

Overall, this week was about learning from the community, experiencing sites in person, and continuing to develop our Greenline proposals with a stronger connection to context.

Written by Brian Medina, Architecture Student